It's far easier to jump on a bandwagon than it is to pause and reflect, analyze available data, and form an opinion while keeping it contingent on changing information.

I just saw a other claim that his position as DOGE czar and his sudden wealth are somehow related. Sure, there was a chain of first one thing and then the other, but the causal link is missing from this social media analysis. Non sequitur, or, it does not follow. It's a classic post hoc fallacy to say A following B alone proves that B caused A.