RE: TripleA Witness

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: TripleA Witness

View the full context

lukestokes in #witness-category • 5 years ago

You're not fooling anyone with a new witness account and pretending it's a legitimately voted member of our distributed community. This account has very few votes compared to lower level witnesses that have put in years of work supporting this chain.

From https://steemian.info/witnesses

We have groups that are trying to force the witnesses from Steemit Inc. out, as the force is claiming that the Steem used for voting was never planned for voting witnesses.

"Witnesses from Steemit" <-- You mean sock puppets sybil attacking the chain? And this isn't some empty claim. It's well documented.

because it would eventually weaken the whole community for all sides.

You sure about that? Imagine a chain split where all the apps, all the users, and all the community move to the new chain. All that would be left on Steem would be Justin and his sock-puppets. Seems in that situation, we win, he loses.

As for your statement, is there no situation where you might take direction action to protect the integrity of the chain? None at all? So if the chain was attacked and value destroyed, you'd be okay with that happening on your watch as an elected witness?

5 years ago in #witness-category by lukestokes

0.00 BPC

1 vote

Sort:

Trending

[-]

project7 5 years ago

For other things, they are just different opinion from your side (and we must value for all different opinion, right?)

This account has very few votes compared to lower level witnesses that have put in years of work supporting this chain.

--> This account is new, but the Steemians to run this witness node are the long time devs and business people who created many things. Also, the @proxy.token is not just one account, but for being backed by more than hundreds of accounts from KR community. I don't think it has any rule for like "only such days of run witness" can be the main witness... am I wrong??

0.00 BPC

[-]

manniman 5 years ago

So it is a matter of opinion whether exchanges should vote on DPoS? Because your Sock 'Witness' is also powered by Poloniex votes.

You can turn it as you want, you've lost your face. This matrix of lies you've presented here, just to hide the fact that you've been bribed. Everyone can see what's going on. I hope it was at least worth your body weight in gold, otherwise you're a complete idiot.

0.00 BPC

[-]

iflagtrash 5 years ago

0.00 BPC

[-]

iflagtrash 5 years ago

0.00 BPC

[-]

lukestokes 5 years ago

Do those long time devs and business people realize they are threatening the chain by not speaking out against an individual who is okay with centralizing the chain? Do they realize how that puts everything built here (including their businesses) at risk?

v0.22.5 was implemented as part of a sybil attack and complete take over of the Steem blockchain using lies and deception with centralized exchanges (who have since reversed their stance). By supporting that, it signals to voters what you think is acceptable as a witness for the Steem blockchain (complete centralization and take over). That, I can not support.

0.00 BPC

[-]

iflagtrash 5 years ago

0.00 BPC