If the blockchain comes under threat, it is the duty of the witnesses to protect the blockchain. Under these circumstances, a temporary restriction to particular actions might be deemed necessary until the threat is removed.
This part is what we see different, as some other top 20 witnesses at that time did also.
What was your price tag? This post contradicts itself at least 5 times, but the major flaw is behind the bullet points.
- Big enough marketing budget to onboard users.
- Easier onboarding for users.
- Services and digital products to create enough sink for the token economy.
That indicated a bailout, but it ain't gonna happen.
You rely on the word of someone that forced his own friend and Co. Founder out of TRON in 2019 (by centralizing it) and made every credible developer of STEEMit Inc. leave the company. What the hell are you even talking about when you say or write 'STEEMit Inc.'. There ain't none left besides the TRON F.
AND YOU THINK, he will stick to his word(bait) after you gave him the power to do else wise? Why would he do that and what's the reason he's not doing it on the TRON chain? Last time I checkt, TRON was worth 0,009$? Where are the sinks in the nearly ~700 developed DAPPs for TRON?
Empty words and deceptions, maybe stay with the facts. Only the past can tell the truth and his past is damn dark and dirty.
And last but not least, if he'd bought his STEEM on the exchanges, just like anyone else... how big would your profit have already been compared to now? Think about that for a second.
There's this famous phrase:
Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me.
