With great power comes great responsibilities. If someone has enough power to fund proposals or elect witnesses they should be more mindful of
waiting and letting users fund or electing first, or even avoid doing so altogether unless they deem extremely necessary to exercise their overwhelming power, because their sole vote can change the outcome
justify their votes, we deserve to know why they funded something or elected someone
If they disagree at least I would expect an explanation as to why they disagree and why they will keep funding, electing and not explaining their votes and supports.