You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal

in #steem • 7 years ago

Completely against all of these proposals. If you're so hellbent on changing the rewards system, why not make it optional? If I, as a content creator, wish to go 50/50, I can make that choice. If I wish to keep it at 75/25, I should also be able to make that choice. I don't see why one rule should affect all accounts, since curation itself only helps a handful of rich accounts...

Seems to me that all these proposed changes are detours for Steemit.inc. If it ain't broke, why fix it? Why not focus on SMTs and other changes that would help grow the platform?

Just my two cents' worth...

7 years ago in #steem by
100%
    -100%

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      0.00 BPC
        3 votes
        Reply Tribe-Mute1
        Sort:  
      • Trending
        • [-]
         7 years ago 

        This would be the best way IMO if you thought there was any hope the system would self-adjust. As an example, why would I ever vote your stuff if you are known to shit on curators. Maybe as a voter I would happily take zero curation for a good cause. Maybe as a creator I want to give back and take zero author rewards. Letting the author choose the ratio would go a long way to showing that they own their own content as well.

        Posted using Partiko Android

        100%
          -100%

            Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

            • Disagreement on rewards
            • Fraud or plagiarism
            • Hate speech or trolling
            • Miscategorized content or spam

            Submit
            0.00 BPC
              1 vote
              Reply