RE: [ENG/DEU] Anniversary! CryptoCompany Is 3 Years Old Today! Thank You! You Made It Possible! Let's Rock On!

[@PowerPaul:] Hey @acidyo. Yes, I run this voting service in coordination with @hivewatchers (by which I mean that I discussed the voter and how it works with them, made a few adjustments before launch, etc.)

I heard about your actual campaign related to @freecompliments, @brofund, @steembasicincome, @neoxian, @helios.token ...

So I assume your question means that you have some problems with CryptoCompany's service, right?

In general, it is important to me to create valuable and also legitimate offers for the community - hence the coordination with Hivewatchers.

What is your concern and how do you think the service should be adjusted?

(P.S.: if you prefer a PM, because your doings [for sure you can assume that all the projects you attack right now are doing a coordinated research] don't like to be revealed in public, I would be available via Discord PM too. I am "powerpaul" there too.)

You are welcome for a calm talk about! But let's try to don't waste each others time - I see the value in your time and don't like to waste it, like my time has a value too.

Greetings & Hive a great day!

Thanks for not looking to waste time, appreciate that a lot especially after some recent events.

My concern is that your project mainly votes for accounts burning your project's token in exchange for a vote thus unfairly affecting others who may be deserving of votes in different forms that hive's curation is meant to work in - effort, quality, consumption, networking, etc.

This form is considered selling votes, your project benefits from the curation methods in more ways than just having people post about your project and you receiving 50% of the rewards in curation but also taking some value from hive to prop up supply scarcity of your token through curation. Buying profitable votes (I didn't check if they are profitable) means easy guaranteed returns for authors, just because they're not posting abuse that @hivewatchers gets involved in and may get them blacklisted from them and yourself doesn't mean the votes are fairly earned if they have to pay for them with the layer 2 token.

If everyone launched such schemes we'd be taking more and more value away from curation and artificially propping up layer 2 token evaluations at the cost of hive and proof of brain. If others don't launch such schemes you're unfairly earning more than them because of these programs of voting for accounts who burn your token. Hive doesn't benefit from this activity but it's hive curation you're utilizing to make it work.