That sounds reasonable. By down-voting extractive content, I push more valuable contribution. I'll ask around a little to make sure of that, but that would be pretty decent. I thought that it's a little like "stealing" rewards.
I thought that it's a little like "stealing" rewards.
Yes, that is the biggest stigma with the downvotes, people think that you are "stealing" their rewards. But those rewards are not theirs until the payout in the first place.
I'd consider it somewhat immoral to be able to make a benefit out if taking rewards away from someone else. I guess I got drawn into the narrative that some notorious extractors spread.Giving the reward back to the pool by downvoting makes a lot more sense. Thanks for explaining!