RE: For the First Time, I Might Be Losing Faith in Steem...

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: For the First Time, I Might Be Losing Faith in Steem...

smooth in #steem • 6 years ago (edited)

That's the nature of any platform where earnings are not derived from advertising, subscriptions, etc. There aren't many of these (maybe just one), so yes it can seem a bit strange.

It is Steem stakeholders, not viewers, who are paying you. Unless you are returning value to Steem stakeholders (or alternately/equivalently the Steem platform itself), paying you is a waste of money.

One obvious way to contribute to the platform would be exclusive content which at least draws users to Steem who want to see it (ideally with some sort of visible metrics on effectiveness in actually doing this). But I see from other comments that you aren't even doing that, your content are just reposts where you expect to get some extra free money from Steem for doing a few clicks to repost. How does that help us?

That's not at all meant as a personal attack, in case it sounded like one. Again, I wish you the best to earn on platforms where you are being paid by viewers or subscribers alone, if that's what you are after.

Steem is a different beast, no doubt.

6 years ago in #steem by smooth

0.00 BPC

Sort:

Trending

[-]

louisthomas 6 years ago

How many people here have got YouTube videos with more than 20,000 views expressing their love for Steemit?

0.00 BPC

4 votes

[-]

smooth 6 years ago

Great! No question it is value add. I wasn't aware of that video, so it is definitely informative.

Now as a content creator, I'm sure you have some idea of a market value on views, typical conversion rates, etc.

How much do you think 20k views on a piece that is two years old is worth?

0.00 BPC

[-]

mariuszkarowski (1) 6 years ago

0.00 BPC

Reveal Comment

[-]

louisthomas 6 years ago

I'm contributing to the platform in the form of content that I've put hours into creating. Without content creators such as myself, there is no content, and thus no reason to be on Steem at all.

I have created exclusive content on multiple occasions. And I've made positive videos about Steem that have gotten thousands of videos on YouTube and led to hundreds (if not thousands) of new people enjoying Steem.

I've done more to assist Steem adoption than at least 99% of people here. Fact.

What does "repost" even mean? Like, I record a video on my camera. It gets posted on YouTube AND Steem AND other places. Why isn't the YouTube video considered a repost of a Steem video? I make content for all platforms.

You don't seem to be viewing things from my perspective, so I'll give up trying to explain. But Steem will never, ever, ever, ever, ever succeed if people are expected to act as sales reps in order to get rewards. Ever, everrrrrrrrrrrr.

0.00 BPC

1 vote

[-]

smooth 6 years ago (edited)

Without content creators such as myself, there is no content, and thus no reason to be on Steem at all.

There is unlimited content and links to content on reddit along with engaging discussions and a huge user base. #19 site on the entire internet according on Alexa (I've seen higher rankings using different metrics). No one is paid to post there. There is also lots of content posted to twitter, facebook, etc. where again, no one is paid. A lot of non-monetized content gets posted on YouTube as well.

I could go on and on. There are certainly opportunities to get paid (a lot) to produce content by using certain platforms (generally ad-supported, less often subscription-supported), but the idea of not being paid (a lot) by a platform to produce content means no content on the platform is absurd.

What does "repost" even mean?

I don't know, I just read that. I assumed it meant older content being reposted. If it is new content posted simultaneously on multiple platforms, then non-exclusive would be a better description.

act as sales reps in order to get rewards

There is no one thing that constitutes contributing value, and claiming anything that does is being a 'sales rep' is taking it to an illogical extreme. Some people might want to actively promote, others can do other things.

Compare the two:

Creator who posts exclusive content that must (since it is exclusive) draw an audience to Steem if it has an audience at all. Creator both actively and passively (since the content is exclusive, any links to the content are promoting) promotes Steem.
Creator who posts on Steem in addition to posting on a bunch of other sites and does nothing else to help Steem.

Which does it make more sense for Steem to (highly) reward?

0.00 BPC

[-]

louisthomas 6 years ago

It's literally impossible to make a full-time living on Steem right now.

I'm one of the most generously rewarded people on here, and will maybe earn the equivalent of $200-300 USD per month. Impossible to survive on.

And even if I did make the leap to post exclusively full-time on Steem, there's absolutely nothing preventing one or two whales from downvoting my content like they have been over the past week, on three occasions.

And this is the problem with down voting for "overrewarding" too. It makes it impossible for people to earn enough on Steem to post exclusively.

If I can earn $60 on a YouTube video, why would I post exclusively on Steem when (especially after downvotes) I might only make $5 on a video? Rational people won't do that.

So you're preventing people from going full time on Steem. If you want a platform full of hobbyists, that's fine. Or only people who are so rich that they don't need financial compensation, that's fine too.

But Steem won't attract professional content creators with this overrewarding downvoting nonsense.

0.00 BPC

2 votes

[-]

markkujantunen 6 years ago (edited)

The entire idea of making a living by being a content creator on Steem at the moment is something anyone living in a first world country should not even consider. What we have is a platform very much a work in progress. The value of the token is speculative as it is based on future expectations of what can be accomplished if everything pans out. It would be completely foolhardy to even consider that at this stage.

What Steem needs is the necessary features for mass onboarding before any content creator can realistically consider this a place to earn a steady income.

Rather than some downvotes I'd worry about the token price plummeting if I were a content creator trying to make a living off Steem.

0.00 BPC

1 vote

[-]

smooth 6 years ago

@markkujantunen pretty much nailed it. The priority right now isn't meaningfully paying a broad swath of content creators for content alone. That is an impossible and unaffordable luxury given Steem's precarious position. It is trying to maximize impact with what little budget we have now (in the manner I described above), and slow or ideally reverse the plummeting token price.

Until then, please consider prioritizing what you can do to help increase the value of your Steem investment, and not treating Steem like an ATM for the tiny pittance it can add to your youtube, etc. earnings, downvotes or no downvotes.

0.00 BPC

3 votes