Government bonds are the least priorities to investment. They are secure but stinky i mean stingy😝
No bond is 100% guaranteed; otherwise, we wouldn't talk about risk, we'd have certainty. Markets assume the US will pay, and other countries are charged a country risk premium.
Sometimes there are interesting bonds. A while ago, I bought one in Argentina that matured in two years, adjusted the principal for Argentine inflation, and had a 24% return. Depending on the circumstances, they can be excellent.
So true. Oh! 24% is really a good return. With this type of investments, the highest one I saw is 16%. Even with the inflation. Now they are back at 3% lol.
It was a pivotal moment. The market expected the Argentine president to lose the midterm legislative elections. Argentine assets had been trending downward for six months, a trend that intensified with the elections, and people also began buying dollars.
Milei received Trump's endorsement, won the election, and the markets celebrated—a shift in the trend.
Yes. Now, if the president were to lose the elections, we would be in the deepest financial hell in Argentina.
i guess not. You are not in the deepest hell. we might claim it here in our country. philippines. you will never experience a flood control project that was government fully paid, inspected, QA/QCed but never existed. Well, there are already lots of issues on every country right now, so it really is hard to tell would be in the deepest financial hell. maybe we can form a group for it.
Lol you get what you pay for. Low risk usually does not pay very well 😆
High risk stuff goes to 0 all the time but we are in crypto so I think everyone knows that by now 😅
Yeah, safer smooth sailing investments are from bank and the government. Low risk and long term but stable. I might think crypto investment is just a gamble right now, this is just my opinion because maybe i never saw crypto as the currency used in making cities.
I think if something is a gamble or not a lot of times depends on how people approach it
Yes, and it depends on peoples point of view. And besides, crypto utilities must be understand by the investor before supporting it so there is clarity in their prospect.
Yea one thing that is tricky with utility in crypto is how to value utility. Not sure there is an easy answer for that. Seems the less bullish the users of a project the more utility projects "need".... but that could just be my anecdotal experience
It is almost the answer or nearest possible answer in my experience also, things needed to show its uses to get its value. This also applies in crypto. Little use, little amount to money, My personal opinion
I think a lot of projects in Crypto are essentially startups.
They tend to have a startup mindset which is just keep trying things until something sticks. Hard to do forever if things don't work because eventually the money train stops.
Crypto has had many bull markets already. I am guessing it will have more but predicting where capital is going to flow to is not easy.
Crypto has had many bull markets already. I am guessing it will have more but predicting where capital is going to flow to is not easy.
Isn't there are projects that are made from hive. I wonder if a type of radar for capital flow is possible here. 