You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: An Open Letter to the Community - HF22.5

in #tron6 years ago

If you were against the soft fork I'd love to hear what you have to say now

Sort:  

You're just trying to stir things up aren't you

I have got to start watching that cooking show...

The reason for me being against 22.2 was that it did not fix the problem of a majority stake holder in a universal way but instead targeted specific accounts which broke the trust of the chain. STINC's actions has proven me correct on the first point and it is hard to see how that trust can be fixed.

Yea sure it didn’t fix anything but I just thought it was to get discussions going over what to do with it since a new stake holder could do what they did now! I thought it was about agreeing new social contracts that community would be okay with I read a post about proposals on what to do with the stake which sounded good

Anyway thing of the past now

I was against the soft fork and I still am. You dont resolve issues by escalating.

You don't that's correct, but you do show peoples character when you escalate!

Yes I am against the soft fork as I do not believe in censorship. I think that 0.22.2 just didn't work at all

Well, I guess you sort of got your way since they're just jumped over the soft fork! I think it was a good acid test for the new management and they failed with this move

The witnesses probably should have tried to talk about this before taking actions to freeze steemit's accounts.

I remember the last time there was as little as a whisper about forking steemit's stakes, ned started powering down. They agreed such a thing won't happen as long as he accepted to use the stakes for development purposes, which he did.

Under new leadership, we should have reached out to rediscuss those terms first. But no, we had to act out of fear by freezing their stakes first. At that point, our intent didn't matter to Justin Sun. He bought the company with his money and he had to protect his assets from threats.

I also think we must have been pretty dumb to think it was okay for ned to sell steemit with all that stake in the first place. If we believed it didn't belong to him, freezing it was a move we should have done a long, long time ago.

From what I read, they tried to reach out and got radio silence and saw an opportunity to force comms with the soft fork before they were voted out like what has just happened. I think the end result is basically the same, they would have been kicked out sooner or later.

It's just good to see the length at which these so-called decentralisation evangelists are willing to go to keep control, he showed his hands and it looks plenty filthy to me, but that's just my opinion