I wouldn't call it that.
But I guess I see where you're coming from. Self-defence.
But I am calling it self-regulation.
Balancing.
There can't be votes without flags.
Or what will be the regulation mechanism?
Going back to centralized oversight? And people hate hw
But don't get that what they wish for is exactly what they hate and fear the most.. and hw was only a joke against it..
Driving off ~1m users was a lot worse for Hive than whatever good you think they were even trying to do.
I feel no desire to post or create content or beauty until I feel free in totality from now and unto perpetuity.
Why does voting require regulation and balancing? Hive requires upvotes. It does not require downvotes. Only governments claiming the power to enslave their subjects tax. Hive is not such a government, and has no need of taxes. There is nothing good or useful to the platform that comes of flags. There is much and bad that does, though.
Sorry have not seen ur comments until now
And also only by accident
I remember why I've blocked you
So you still want to ban the selfregulation mechanism and cannot see any reason why not?
Even though I told you like a million times?
Okay - one simple question:
Without downvotes. How do you counter abuse, plagiarism, or even straight up pedophiles voting each others pedo posts?
Not at all?
Great! And now go and find a brain.
You are against centralised oversight but want to take away the tools from the community to prevent that. And therefore just manifest exactly what you do not want.
Anyway, I surrendered trying to argue with you long ago. And you will stay blocked.
Maybe you should also read @antisocialist @jin-out @daretodefy
Do read the paper I cite before you cheer for centralizing stake that DV's enable.
If that's directed at me, I was not cheering for anything, but extending my thanks for the shoutout that Wolfchen gave me. The proper English cheers not a hip hip hoorah.
I better understand the phrase's use now in that context, as an American I understand several common words differently than English people use them. Cheers are what cheerleaders do in America, not a toast or tip of the hat, so my interpretation of your comment was through that distinctly American understanding of the word.
I do appreciate your understanding of that dynamic, and explanation why I interpreted your comment differently than you meant it.
https://peakd.com/hive/@khrom/why-downvotes-contradict-decentralization-a-mathematical-perspective
DV's are not a means of avoiding centralization, but of ensuring it.
Your resort to ad hominems demonstrates why you cannot tolerate rational discussion, because you demonstrate you are incapable of it.
Remain ignorant as your policies depend on, since the ability to reason eludes you, as that is all blocking arguments you cannot answer enables you to do. It emulates what you do in your head, blocking reason out when it conflicts with your biases.
Bro what is wrong with you
You should not do ad hominem if you COMPLAIN ABOUT EXACTLY THAT
XD
Also you fucking strawman reductionist reduce me to that cuz you JUST FUCKING DONT GET THE ARGUMENTS and ACT AS IF I WOULD NOT GIVE ANY
FFFFFFSSSSSS
it's fucking nihilism to interact with you
Go ban downvotes and suffer in the swamp with hive pedos
Go team up with indextrader and other "let's abolish downvotes" commies
Pointing out facts isn't insulting you, isn't an ad hominem as you demonstrably resort to.
You don't provide any substantive arguments that refute the mathematical demonstration that DV's enable stake to be centralized. Go ahead and do that, and the discussion can proceed to reasonable consideration of that evidence.
Here is your simple question, liar:
"Bro what is wrong with you
"You should not do ad hominem if you COMPLAIN ABOUT EXACTLY THAT
"XD
"Also you fucking strawman reductionist reduce me to that cuz you JUST FUCKING DONT GET THE ARGUMENTS and ACT AS IF I WOULD NOT GIVE ANY
"FFFFFFSSSSSS
"it's fucking nihilism to interact with you
Go ban downvotes and suffer in the swamp with hive pedos
"Go team up with indextrader and other "let's abolish downvotes" commies"
Nowhere do you even ask a question, and every line is pejoration, a textbook example of ad hominem attack. Ad hominems are widely and properly understood as the resort of those incapable of raising arguments substantive to debate, and that is the entirety of your commentary product.
Go fuck yourself, moron.
That's an ad hominem. Seem familiar? That's because it encapsulates every bit of your comments.
fucking commie
You speak only of your fears. What comes out of you only reveals what is in you.
Finally stop crying and whining about a few flagged cents
Faggot
https://peakd.com/hive-122315/@woelfchen/people-still-whining-about-flags
Also stop whining like a bitch about some insults
On a free speech platform
Pathetic faggot