let me be critical, but constructive (thats a trained editor's way: when everything is ok, no need to shout out at all. you is urged to say something only when theres something missing, when theres smth critical)
so..... maybe I'm not a newbie already, but I 'm finding this brief text not very useful. cause it brings on very very basic things, I'm already in the know, and lacks the things I dont know, which maybe seem obvious so they dont go to any starting-readme-first-pack
- when you describe a '1-photo post', you say 'add something, more text'....
I understand what stands behind this. newbie may not. a good thing is: direct me (a new user) to the PAL post descripting 'a good and a poor' post.
links, links, links.
info about good (and easy... or at least not so hard) contests that will help to announce more loudly about yourself?
recommendations for tags?
some notice about the 'nuances' unnoticeable for the beginners. (personally, I was a bit shocked and frustrated to see my resource mana momentarily went down, after me editing out some typos in my post, 10 times in a row.... haha! that counts as 10 posts, not one. obvious, you say? no!)
etc
etc
etc
actually, I tried to google out 'a poor post description' (I remember I found one by PAL, somewhere... but could not find it once again). but instead got such articles as 'why I left steemit' (haha)
https://prodabbler.com/why-i-switched-from-steemit-to-medium-62d625cc5ee1
https://medium.com/@heymattsokol/why-i-left-the-steem-blockchain-bb0214a451b8
reading these is quite a different story. sorry, I will cancel my further commenting on this. xD