Certainly this is not fair.
Games have rules.
If we tilt those rules to favor one side over the other the game changes.
As a user that started with 3 steem, i was best served by the math under the rules of the experiment.
I think steem is best served by mass adoption.
Capping influence at 500mv (slowly ascending) grows the distribution most effectively, imo.
There isn't as much question if steem will persist at this point.
I don't know the actual numbers, but tanking the price is hardly in the maximizer's interest, imo.
There are plenty of tokens on steem engine to soak up some of the liquidity created by dumping whales.
If they prefer to leave steem entirely, good riddance.
Better a lower price than life on our knees, imo.
They can only dump it once.