RE: Downvote Pool Deep Dive

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvote Pool Deep Dive

alexs1320 in #steem • 6 years ago

The same shop. The same chef. The same ingredients. The same taste. The same price. But now, we are wondering how our pizza-shop will be affected if we start cutting it into 6 pieces instead of 8 pieces

Is it going to attract new customers - no
Is it going to chase away some old customers - maybe, but no
Will it change the earnings of our pizza shop - no

red button, redistribution, changing ratio authors/curators are not going to create anything measurable. Maybe it can even affect negatively because people will be wondering why on Earth those people are discussing this topic when they have at least 100 more important problems?

6 years ago in #steem by alexs1320

0.00 BPC

7 votes

Sort:

Trending

[-]

jrcornel 6 years ago

Shuffling deck chairs on the titanic. SMTs and communities are the only shot out of this mess at this point, though I think these changes will be a net negative, so even worse than just shuffling the deck chairs.

0.00 BPC

8 votes

[-]

valued-customer 6 years ago

MIRA and ten thousand 'top' witnesses might be able to help. Decentralization is the cure for centralization, and counters the problem of centralization of tokens that is the source of many of the problems Steem has.

0.00 BPC

4 votes

[-]

iflagtrash 6 years ago

I flag trash. You have received a flag.

0.00 BPC

3 votes

[-]

alexs1320 6 years ago

Again, nothing but math...

Stolen from @arcange:

As you can see, the median payout is 0,10 $.
Half of the posts earn less than 0,10 $ per post.

Not a single new user will come here to (*most probably) earn 0,10 $ per day. It's maybe 50 $ per year?!

However, there is something completely different that Steemit could do.

I'll send them the official proposal concerning this :D

0.00 BPC

2 votes

[-]

dexterdumb 6 years ago (edited)

"Is it going to chase away some old customers - maybe, but no"
I have seen quite a chilling effect on many that I follow. A few of which have been "chased" off and no longer post and have powered down. But your other 2 points I 100% agree. Before they went dark they posted several instances where simple malice were the reason for their flags. Initial content was flagged, they (content creator's) objected, waves of more flags ensued. It had nothing to do w/bad content after the initial flag, which is obviously subjective to begin with...

0.00 BPC

4 votes