I have found it depends how you say it. It's difficult to articulate things you feel very strongly about without resorting to ad hominems, insults, or exaggerating things until you're making claims without any evidence, and these will certainly get you DV'd.

It's really better to only post about things after you've had time to gather your thoughts, any citations you might need to prove your point, and allow your anger to cool enough where you can speak without being unnecessarily rude or insulting. I have argued with many whales and consensus witnesses, but because I refrain (mostly) from making accusations I can't prove, don't call anyone names my mother wouldn't call me, and if I make a mistake I do my best to own up as quickly as I can, I have only rarely been flagged for my opinions. BPC3 is basically restating a comment I made to Hurt a day or two ago, and appending an ad for Blurt to it. I don't mind my words being cleaned up and stated more effectively. I stand by what I said, and as I pointed out, imitation is the highest form of flattery, but I do not recommend Blurt for reasons well known to Blurt users, with whom I have discussed them. It does bother me to have my words added to a Blurt Ad. Please indicate that the points I made were not made to advertise Blurt, if you have any influence over BPC3.

I have treated you with the same honesty and manner of speech that I do any whale, witness, or other user on Hive, and it isn't fair to mistreat me in return for my good treatment.