You're very welcome, @manuvert! Yes, you could, and it worked fantastically well! Oh wow, October?!? That's so early! I'd say it's more complex than the 'global warming' narrative, but that's a big conversation. May the return in force very soon! Thank you! May your Friday be exceptionally excellent! 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!LOLZ
Not sure what you mean by narrative, but what I see is confirmed by several mathematical models, some that I ran myself in the past, and correlating fairly well with data collected all over the world for decades. It's not that complex.
Science is an incredible tool, that unfortunately can also be used to obfiscate important information and push certain perspectives, narratives, which are not necessarily accurate. Regarding 'global warming' and 'climate change', no conversation on the subject would be complete without taking into account the changes and cycles through which the sun has been going, which is having a heating effect on the plants in the solar system, earth included. Another important component is the now heavy use of weather manipulation/warfare technologies, to the point now that I'm not really sure what weather on the planet is actually natural presently.
CO2, the so-called 'greenhouse gas', the levels of which are being used to push an exceedingly pernicious net-zero agenda, is not, and has never been the problem. In past time periods the CO2 content of the atmosphere was far higher than it is today (without industry), and the we're actually much closer to the lower-level danger area below which plant life cannot grow. If plant life cannot grow, then the vary majority of other life forms on the planet, across all kingdoms, also would perish, and quite quickly.
On the subject of science, a very strong distinction must be drawn between what is actually science, and its rather basterdized version today, scientism. Climatological scientists are not at all in agreement on 'climate change'. Unfortunately those that do not agree with the 'mainstream narrative' spouted in the echo-chamber are discredited and sidelined, which has happened, and continues to happen, to a great many truly brilliant scientists, across all fields. No actual scientist will ever say 'trust the science', because of the data cannot be questioned and challenged, it ain't science. 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙
It hadn't happened in a while, but one more person that doesn't know me seems to suggest I blindly believe some sort of myth created by some evil entity, usually called the government, the media or the mainstream (which one usually remains a mystery), while citing easily debunked ideas. I'll be honest, that always annoys me. The infamous CO2 argument! Often believed to be the one "that will shut them up". If I had a nickel for every time I heard a version of it... Well, it would still be completely wrong of course. It's common sense, but if that is not sufficient, it's been shown by pretty much every independent large scale studies conducted in real natural environment, not laboratory.
I honestly don't want to waste your time, so I'll keep discussing these topics with actual climate scientists, and I'll keep it more mundane here on Hive.
