The example was to show that your statement that every untrustworthy person should be treated the same isn't right.

It wasn't a statement (declaration or assertion).

It was simply a question.

I understand that you believe that some "crimes" deserve more punishment than other "crimes".

I'm just trying to figure out what specific "crime" you believe deserves to have their steem wallet account frozen.

For example if a small account holder said the exact same things and threatened the exact same actions and even did or attempted to do the exact same things as Justin Sun, do you believe their steem wallet account deserves to be frozen?

What if the account holder was a red-fish, or a whale?

Is it the specific words and actions that makes Justin Sun a "heinous" "criminal", or is it simply their incredibly large stake that makes Justin Sun a "heinous" "criminal"?

I'm just saying, it seems like a lot of powerful "community leaders" would probably be more than happy to start freezing accounts of "dangerous" individuals.

Do you personally believe that would be "inappropriate"?

Or do you think freezing steem wallets might be acceptable, but should be carefully reviewed on a case-by-case basis (just like the current blacklists)?