Well that's a great question. and I am so glad that you asked it because I want to answer!!!!
When steem was valued higher - I was earning maybe $5 a post? but steem was worth $6
What does that mean? It means that my post was not even worth 1 steem
Now - let's take yesterday's post. It was valued at $6 so far. somewhere around there. I earned ALMOST THE SAME value as 2 years ago - $6 - but the steem equivalent is about 14??? 14 steem! for the same USD value because steem was not as valuable.
stay with me... lol
so - when I was earning when steem was higher - WHAT SHOULD I HAVE DONE??
I should have TAKEN the money OUT. because it was high. The pressure when steem is high is to POWER DOWN AND CASH OUT.
why???
BECAUSE I HELD IT over the next 2 years, and i lost the MAJORITY of value there!
when it was high - I did not sell. I kept it - so that I could hope that it increased in value over the long term.
when it is low - NO ONE WANTS TO SELL. they want to keep hodling!
When steem increases... you really think the investors that we are so concerned about aren't gonna start selling as soon as they make a profit????
If we only look at steem as a currency -then people will always want to powerdown and sell.
but if we look at steem as an investment (which i do) then we encourage them to hodl... cuz we assume that better times are coming.
bottom line?
when 2017 had the high numbers? I would have been wise to SELL and repurchase more steem when it was low.
Instead - I held it. and it sank sank sank. and i lost all the value of it
Steem at a higher value puts significant pressure on people to sell. They don't want to lose money by waiting to see what it will do. Most will take the money and run.
so what we need to do - is not worry about pushing the value of steem up at the risk of hurting the platform.
we need to fix the platform and trust THAT will drive the price of steem.
If people feel that this is a place WORTH holding the steem. they won't sell it at the drop of a hat, they'll wait until it soars like bitcoin and then EVERYONE will rush in.
and... steem's government is not a democracy. a democracy shows that everyone has a say. and we really don't.
this is a republic. where we give our vote to (top witnesses) people who represent us. and right now - they are not representing the people's voices
last point... For all the people that are hearing this proposal for the first time (and there are so many that its actually sad....) the majority say THIS as their first response: " then i guess i better start autovoting bigger accounts."
does that sound like people are going to start actively reading? or does that sound like they will be looking for ANY way to recover their losses.
i do not have high hopes for this proposal.