How would you feel about someone with about as much HP as I have only voting for themselves?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
Does it really matter at the end of the day?
If you're not voting for yourself on this account, you're using a separate account. If not, then it will come from friends/tribe leaders with high HP even if your content doesn't actually contribute anything of value to the chain, other than that it's coming from autovotes.
Do a test right now... You average roughly 800-1200 words per post... Do a 100 Word post and you'll still be making over $5 per post.
We both started Steem at around the same time, in fact, I started before you. There is a Cabal and a group of elites and I'm not a part of them for calling them out.
Just a simple question. Wanted to know how you'd feel about that scenario. Got an answer?
Alright. Another question. If you were building your own community or tribe, running it how you see fit, like a business, with a few rules and guidelines, as people do here, then someone came along and broke your rules, would you be okay with that? Just let it slide?
If people want to overly enforce their policies, then that is up to them. Most of the tribes who do end up enforcing their policies harshly end up faltering, just like MarkyMark's Shittoken "STEM".
Either way, the devs pushed the 20% interest on HBD for the exact purpose of decreasing the influence that tokens have on the second-layer chain. It was never meant to stabilize HBD. So just like the main devs on Hive wanted to decrease the power, it's up to them; Just like it was up to Justin Sun to blacklist the former devs of Steem.
Those who hold witness power, and consensus, control the game. My opinion is meaningless, so your questions are just filled with empty stupidity when you know how this chain works.
You're really daft, aren't you?
It wouldn't matter, at the end of the day. Once again, my opinion is meaningless. Whether I would support it or don't support it.
Yet, I'll answer as if I was a tribe leader...
My tribe would be general (all tags) and if people rightfully owned the stake to the currency that has a scotbot attached to the tribe, then they are free to do as they please with their own voting power and their own posts.
Okay. So that's how you'd run your community. If someone was running theirs and politely suggested you follow their rules, would you be okay with that?
So now you're targeting me?
Why have you guys not implemented anything into the code that would actually benefit the "system" you guys wish to create?
Let's be honest, the developers and Hive "leaders" have been using self-votes for a long time already or have just instead used alternative accounts to fluff up their own posts.
It's been 6 Years that I've been on this platform; You guys STILL haven't implemented ANYTHING that stops self-votes.
Please answer:
- Why have you guys done nothing to codify limitations on self-votes on the main chain?
- Why do you guys continuously target smaller accounts that bring attention to this even when you guys claim it is in the best interest of the chain to limit these actions/transactions?
- Are you willing to come forward with a public livestream on this discussion with me? Or respond with a public video detailing your reasoning?